Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) stock analysis

Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) clears 2 of this site's 8 mechanical value filters, 5 of 8 Buffett-style checks and 2 of 5 Lynch-style checks. At $47.30 it trades 155.0% above this site's neutral DCF value (a margin of safety of -155.0%). Its earnings quality rates Strong and it returns 0.0% to shareholders net of dilution. Figures are as of October 23, 2026, from SEC filings and market data refreshed weekly; this is educational analysis, not investment advice.

Data as of October 23, 2026. Refreshed weekly from SEC filings and market data.

What does Monster Beverage do?

Monster Beverage sells energy drinks, mostly under the Monster brand. It has long-term distribution agreements with The Coca-Cola Company, which also owns roughly a fifth of Monster's shares.

Brands and businesses it owns

  • Monster Energy
  • Reign
  • NOS
  • Full Throttle
  • Burn
  • Bang

What stands out about Monster Beverage?

  • The share price implies 32.4% yearly growth. At $47.30, MNST's free cash flow of $1.09 per share would have to grow 32.4% a year, fading to 2.5% by year 10, for this site's DCF (10% discount rate) to match the price. This site's baseline starts at 8%, so the price asks for more growth than the baseline. Change the assumptions.
  • Misses 4 of the 8 value filters. It fails Trailing P/E < 25 (42.93), PEG Ratio < 1.5 (3.09) and Price/Book < 8 (9.76) and 1 more; the other 2 pass and 2 were not evaluated. See every filter.
  • The margin of safety is falling. It went from -138% on Oct 7 to -155% on Oct 23 across 5 weekly readings. See the trend.
  • Strongest against peers: debt / equity. At 0.00 (peer median 1.13) it ranks 1st of 6 among beverages stocks this site tracks. See the ranking.
  • Weakest against peers: P/E ratio. At 42.9× (peer median 23.6×) it ranks 6th of 6 among beverages stocks this site tracks. See the ranking.
MNST Monster Beverage Corp
$47.30
2/8 filtersBuffett 5/8Lynch 2/5⚠ 2 Munger flagsClick any figure for its source

How has Monster Beverage's share price moved?

The interactive price chart needs JavaScript.

Is Monster Beverage undervalued? The value diligence check

Every value-investing signal this site computes for this stock, gathered in one place: the same real numbers from the tools below, not a new score.

  • Margin of safety (DCF) -155.0%
  • P/E vs. its own history 42.9x · near the expensive end Real range: 35.3x–45.4x over 5 years (net income per diluted share from each fiscal year's 10-K, paired with the real closing price at that fiscal year-end).
  • Wall St. analyst rating Buy · 3.81/5 32 analysts this month: 7 strong buy, 12 buy, 13 hold, 0 sell, 0 strong sell (Finnhub). Up from 3.79 last month.
  • Altman Z″-Score (bankruptcy risk) 12.25 · Safe zone
  • Earnings quality (is the profit real?) Strong · all 5 checks clean Beneish M-score −2.30 · accruals −2.2% of assets · 114% of profit arrived as cash · stock comp 1.5% of revenue · share count −3.5% a year. From the latest 10-K (year to Dec 2025) - see the Earnings Quality Screener for how each check is scored.
  • Shareholder yield (cash back to owners) 0.0% net Latest fiscal year (2025): dividends 0.0% + buybacks 0.1% − stock comp 0.1%, as a share of today's market cap. Stock comp outruns what comes back in cash. Over 14 years its split-adjusted share count fell 12%. See Shareholder Yield Leaders.
  • Capital needed to grow (See's test) $2.20 per $1 of new profit · FlightSafety-like Operating profit $1.2B → $2.1B, capital needed $2.9B → $4.9B, 2016–2025 (3-year averages); return on capital now 43% before tax. Buffett's See's Candies needed $0.42 per $1 of new profit, FlightSafety $3.20, a typical grower about $5. See Capital-Light Compounders.
  • PEG (growth at a reasonable price) 3.09 · Well above fair P/E 42.9× ÷ 13.9% a year of growth behind it. 347th lowest of 447 stocks with a usable PEG. Lynch's fair value is a PEG of 1; a very high PEG usually means almost no growth, a very low one a profit spike. See PEG Ratio Ranking.
  • Compounder lenses (4) 2 of 4 · misses capital-light, price Capital-light growth: not cleared (profit grew 1.8×, under 2×); Profit is real: cleared; Cash to owners: cleared; Fair price (PEG): not cleared (PEG 3.09, over 1.5). See Compounders at a Fair Price, which also lets you move the PEG bar.
  • Value trap check Clear
  • Munger's Inversion Check 2 flags
  • Standing vs. sector peers 4 of 6 measures above the median Compared with the 5 other beverages stocks this site tracks: 3 in the top third, 2 in the bottom third.

How does Monster Beverage compare with its peers?

4 of 6 measures sit above the median of the 5 other beverages stocks tracked here, 3 in the top third and 2 in the bottom third.

  • P/E ratiolower is cheaper · peer median 23.6× 42.9× 6th of 6
  • Free-cash-flow yieldhigher is cheaper · peer median 4.9% 2.3% 6th of 6
  • Return on equityhigher is better · peer median 24% 25% 3rd of 6
  • Net marginhigher is better · peer median 19.7% 23.1% 2nd of 6
  • Revenue growthhigher is better, year on year · peer median 6.4% 20.4% 2nd of 6
  • Debt / equitylower is safer · peer median 1.13 0.00 1st of 6

Peers are the stocks this site tracks in the same sector group, not every listed competitor. The bar runs from the weakest peer (left) to the strongest (right); the tick is the middle. Measures that don't apply to a sector (cash-flow yield for banks, debt for financials) are left out.

What would Buffett & Lynch say?

Warren Buffett ✕ Leans no (5/8)

Buffett's checklist is built around durable, profitable businesses bought at sensible prices, and MNST doesn't clear enough of it yet. In its favor: MNST is currently earning a strong return on shareholders' equity, and has kept that profitability up over five years, not just this year, carries a conservative amount of debt relative to equity, converts sales into profit at healthy margins, and earns many times its interest expense, so debt service isn't a worry. Where it comes up short: MNST hasn't grown earnings per share fast enough over five years to impress him, is trading above what a conservative discounted-cash-flow estimate says it's worth right now, and trades rich relative to owner earnings, the real cash the business could pay out.

  • ROE (TTM) > 11% ✓
  • ROE (5yr avg) > 11% ✓
  • Debt/Equity < 0.5 ✓
  • Pretax margin > 15% ✓
  • EPS growth (5yr) > 7% ✕
  • Interest coverage > 5x ✓
  • Trading below intrinsic value (DCF) ✕
  • Price vs. owner earnings < 25x ✕
  • Bonus: returning capital via buybacks FY2025
Peter Lynch ✕ Leans no (2/5) · Fast Grower

Lynch looked for growth stories that weren't overpriced for that growth, and MNST falls short of his bar. In its favor: MNST is growing earnings 20-50% a year, his classic fast-grower zone, and isn't leaning on debt to fund that growth. Where it comes up short: MNST doesn't clear the tighter PEG bar a fast grower needs to justify its pace, is priced above what he'd pay even for a company growing this quickly, and isn't generating enough free cash flow to justify a fast grower's richer price.

  • PEG < 1 (stricter for fast growers) ✕
  • EPS growth 20%-50% ✓
  • Debt/Equity < 0.5 ✓
  • P/E < 40 ✕
  • Price/FCF < 40 ✕

Quantitative approximations of each investor's documented approach, not endorsed by either investor or their estates - commentary, not this site's actual ranking criteria. Buffett never published a numeric checklist: only 2 of his 8 checks here trace to his own documented concepts ("owner earnings," from his 1986 shareholder letter, and "price is what you pay, value is what you get," his case against fixed P/E/P/B ceilings) - the other 6 (ROE, debt, margins, growth, interest coverage) use commonly-cited thresholds that are not numbers he himself published. The 8 hard filters below (plus the Munger check and Graham margin of safety) are this site's real, mechanical screen and are computed completely independently of the checklists above.

Which of the 8 value filters does Monster Beverage pass?

  • Market Cap > $25B $91.4B
  • Trailing P/E < 25 42.93
  • PEG Ratio < 1.5 3.09
  • Price/Book < 8 9.76
  • Price/Sales < 7 9.91
  • EPS Growth YoY > -5% +19.1%
  • vs 50-day MA (±12%) Not evaluated †
  • vs 200-day MA (±12%) Not evaluated †

What is Monster Beverage's margin of safety?

-155.0% above intrinsic value

-138% on 2026-10-07 → -155% on 2026-10-23 (5 weekly readings).

Where is Monster Beverage in its 52-week range?

52w low $33.16 Now $47.30 52w high $49.97

What is the short interest in Monster Beverage?

% of Float 3.2%
Days to Cover 4.3
vs Prior Period +7.3%

45,398,661 shares short as of 2026-09-30 (FINRA settlement date). Reported twice a month, so this only changes roughly every two weeks, not daily.

What could go wrong with Monster Beverage? Munger's inversion check

"Invert, always invert." Instead of reasons to buy, these are reasons to hesitate, not a verdict, and not everything worth knowing about a business.

  • Margin of safety, even in the bull case -51%
  • Short interest under 5% of float 3.2%
  • Passes most of the 6 fundamental filters 2/6 passed
  • Price run-up backed by value, not just momentum +43% off 52wk low

Doesn't cover circle of competence, management quality, or accounting concerns: those need judgment, not data.

How much have Monster Beverage shareholders gained per year?

+8.0%· in USD

Earnings growth per share plus dividend.

Earnings per share, growth per year +8.0%
Dividend (yield on the price) n/a
Pace: 5yr vs 9yr 8% vs 14%, slowing
Profit margin, 2016 to 2025 23% → 23%

An earnings-based proxy, not a stock-price total return - it doesn't capture multiple expansion/contraction or reinvested dividends. EPS from MNST's own 10-K filings; dividend yield is the current trailing yield on today's price, from the same weekly fetch as the rest of this site.

What do Monster Beverage's 10-year financials show?

From MNST's own 10-K filings (SEC EDGAR): up to the last 10 fiscal years. Press any year's bars for the exact figures.

Revenue Net income
$0 $2.8B $5.5B $8.3B 2016 revenue: $3.0B 2016 net income: $713.0M '16 2017 revenue: $3.4B 2017 net income: $821.0M '17 2018 revenue: $3.8B 2018 net income: $993.0M '18 2019 revenue: $4.2B 2019 net income: $1.1B '19 2020 revenue: $4.6B 2020 net income: $1.4B '20 2021 revenue: $5.5B 2021 net income: $1.4B '21 2022 revenue: $6.3B 2022 net income: $1.2B '22 2023 revenue: $7.1B 2023 net income: $1.6B '23 2024 revenue: $7.5B 2024 net income: $1.5B '24 2025 revenue: $8.3B 2025 net income: $1.9B '25
Debt/Equity (2025) n/a
Open in Technical Analysis → Open in Intrinsic Value Calculator → Educational content only, not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions about Monster Beverage

What kind of company is Monster Beverage?

Monster Beverage sells energy drinks, mostly under the Monster brand. It has long-term distribution agreements with The Coca-Cola Company, which also owns roughly a fifth of Monster's shares. Brands and businesses it owns include Monster Energy, Reign, NOS, Full Throttle, Burn and Bang. This site groups it with Beverages stocks.

Is Monster Beverage trading above or below its DCF value?

At $47.30, MNST trades 155.0% above this site's neutral DCF value of $18.55 per share, a margin of safety of −155.0%. That DCF projects free cash flow for 10 years, with growth starting at 8% and fading to 2.5%, discounted at 10%; it is one set of assumptions, not a forecast. Test your own in the Intrinsic Value Calculator.

How many of this site's 8 value filters does Monster Beverage pass?

MNST passes 2 of 8. It passes Market Cap > $25B ($91.4B) and EPS Growth YoY > -5% (+19.1%). It misses Trailing P/E < 25 (42.93), PEG Ratio < 1.5 (3.09), Price/Book < 8 (9.76) and Price/Sales < 7 (9.91). vs 50-day MA (±12%) and vs 200-day MA (±12%) were not evaluated, because the moving-average checks only run on stocks that clear the fundamentals first. The 8-filter list shows every stock that passes all of them.

What growth is Monster Beverage's share price pricing in?

At $47.30, MNST's free cash flow of $1.09 per share would have to grow 32.4% a year, fading to 2.5% by year 10, for this site's DCF (10% discount rate) to match the price. This site's baseline starts at 8%, so the price asks for more growth than the baseline. Change the assumptions.

Does Monster Beverage pass the Buffett-style and Lynch-style checklists?

On this site's Buffett-style checklist MNST clears 5 of 8 checks and leans no; it misses EPS growth (5yr) > 7%, Trading below intrinsic value (DCF) and Price vs. owner earnings < 25x. On the Lynch-style checklist it clears 2 of 5 and leans no, with Fast Grower as its Lynch category; it misses PEG < 1 (stricter for fast growers), P/E < 40 and Price/FCF < 40. These are this site's own rules written in the style of each investor, not their personal views; the rules are in the Editorial Standards.

When does Monster Beverage report earnings next?

Monster Beverage's next earnings report is expected on October 29, 2026 after the market closes, with analysts expecting earnings of $0.30 per share. Dates come from the Finnhub earnings calendar and can move. In its last 4 quarters it beat the estimate 4 times, by an average of +6.6%.

Where do these numbers come from?

About this Monster Beverage Corp analysis

This page shows every value-investing check the site runs on Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) in one place: the 8 mechanical filters, the Buffett and Lynch checklists, a margin of safety from a disclosed DCF, earnings quality, shareholder yield and how it ranks against its sector peers. The numbers come from SEC filings and public market data, refreshed weekly, and the same rules apply to every stock on the stock list. See Editorial Standards for the sources and the rules, or run your own filters in the stock screener.