Kimberly-Clark Corp (KMB) stock analysis

Kimberly-Clark Corp (KMB) clears 3 of this site's 8 mechanical value filters, 4 of 8 Buffett-style checks and 3 of 5 Lynch-style checks. At $112.32 it trades 18.1% above this site's neutral DCF value (a margin of safety of -18.1%). Its earnings quality rates Strong and it returns +4.5% to shareholders net of dilution. Figures are as of October 23, 2026, from SEC filings and market data refreshed weekly; this is educational analysis, not investment advice.

Data as of October 23, 2026. Refreshed weekly from SEC filings and market data.

What does Kimberly-Clark do?

Kimberly-Clark makes everyday paper-based and hygiene products such as tissues, diapers, wipes, paper towels and feminine and adult-care products, sold in around 175 countries.

Brands and businesses it owns

  • Huggies
  • Kleenex
  • Cottonelle
  • Scott
  • Viva
  • Kotex
  • Depend
  • Pull-Ups
  • Poise

What stands out about Kimberly-Clark?

  • The share price implies 12.2% yearly growth. At $112.32, KMB's free cash flow of $5.57 per share would have to grow 12.2% a year, fading to 2.5% by year 10, for this site's DCF (10% discount rate) to match the price. This site's baseline starts at 8%, so the price asks for more growth than the baseline. Change the assumptions.
  • Misses 3 of the 8 value filters. It fails PEG Ratio < 1.5 (11.73), Price/Book < 8 (20.98) and EPS Growth YoY > -5% (-32.2%); the other 3 pass and 2 were not evaluated. See every filter.
  • Weakest against peers: revenue growth. At −12.2% (peer median 1.8%) it ranks 19th of 19 among consumer products stocks this site tracks. See the ranking.
  • Short interest is elevated. 16.1% of the float is sold short, 14.2 days to cover, above this site's 5% flag. See the figures.
  • Dividend raises 2 of 6 flags. Its trailing yield is 4.57%. See the Sustainable Dividend Screener.
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corp
$112.32
3/8 filtersBuffett 4/8Lynch 3/5⚠ 2 Munger flagsClick any figure for its source

How has Kimberly-Clark's share price moved?

The interactive price chart needs JavaScript.

Is Kimberly-Clark undervalued? The value diligence check

Every value-investing signal this site computes for this stock, gathered in one place: the same real numbers from the tools below, not a new score.

  • Margin of safety (DCF) -18.1%
  • P/E vs. its own history 18.8x · near the cheap end Real range: 16.6x–26.7x over 5 years (net income per diluted share from each fiscal year's 10-K, paired with the real closing price at that fiscal year-end).
  • Wall St. analyst rating Buy · 3.57/5 21 analysts this month: 4 strong buy, 6 buy, 10 hold, 0 sell, 1 strong sell (Finnhub).
  • Altman Z″-Score (bankruptcy risk) 2.16 · Grey zone
  • Earnings quality (is the profit real?) Strong · all 5 checks clean Beneish M-score −2.54 · accruals −4.5% of assets · 151% of profit arrived as cash · stock comp 0.9% of revenue · share count −0.8% a year. From the latest 10-K (year to Dec 2025) - see the Earnings Quality Screener for how each check is scored.
  • Shareholder yield (cash back to owners) +4.5% net Latest fiscal year (2025): dividends 4.5% + buybacks 0.4% − stock comp 0.4%, as a share of today's market cap. Over 14 years its split-adjusted share count fell 16%. See Shareholder Yield Leaders.
  • Capital needed to grow (See's test) Profit did not grow in 10 years Operating profit $3.0B → $2.3B, capital needed $8.2B → $7.3B, 2016–2025 (3-year averages); return on capital now 32% before tax. Buffett's See's Candies needed $0.42 per $1 of new profit, FlightSafety $3.20, a typical grower about $5. See Capital-Light Compounders.
  • PEG (growth at a reasonable price) 11.7 · Well above fair P/E 18.8× ÷ 1.6% a year of growth behind it. 430th lowest of 447 stocks with a usable PEG. Lynch's fair value is a PEG of 1; a very high PEG usually means almost no growth, a very low one a profit spike. See PEG Ratio Ranking.
  • Compounder lenses (4) 2 of 4 · misses capital-light, price Capital-light growth: not cleared (profit grew 0.8×, under 2×); Profit is real: cleared; Cash to owners: cleared; Fair price (PEG): not cleared (PEG 11.7, over 1.5). See Compounders at a Fair Price, which also lets you move the PEG bar.
  • Value trap check Clear
  • Munger's Inversion Check 2 flags
  • Standing vs. sector peers 2 of 7 measures above the median Compared with the 18 other consumer products stocks this site tracks: 2 in the top third, 2 in the bottom third.
  • Dividend payout sustainability 2/6 flags

How does Kimberly-Clark compare with its peers?

2 of 7 measures sit above the median of the 18 other consumer products stocks tracked here, 2 in the top third and 2 in the bottom third.

  • P/E ratiolower is cheaper · peer median 18.3× 18.8× 11th of 19
  • Free-cash-flow yieldhigher is cheaper · peer median 5.1% 5.0% 12th of 19
  • Return on equityhigher is better · peer median 30% 123% 6th of 19
  • Net marginhigher is better · peer median 11.8% 11.8% 10th of 19
  • Revenue growthhigher is better, year on year · peer median 1.8% −12.2% 19th of 19
  • Debt / equitylower is safer · peer median 0.54 3.74 15th of 19
  • Dividend yieldamong dividend payers · peer median 2.44% 4.57% 3rd of 16

Peers are the stocks this site tracks in the same sector group, not every listed competitor. The bar runs from the weakest peer (left) to the strongest (right); the tick is the middle. Measures that don't apply to a sector (cash-flow yield for banks, debt for financials) are left out.

What would Buffett & Lynch say?

Warren Buffett ✕ Leans no (4/8)

Buffett's checklist is built around durable, profitable businesses bought at sensible prices, and KMB doesn't clear enough of it yet. In its favor: KMB is currently earning a strong return on shareholders' equity, and has kept that profitability up over five years, not just this year, earns many times its interest expense, so debt service isn't a worry, and trades at a reasonable multiple of owner earnings, his own term for the real cash a business could pay out. Where it comes up short: KMB carries more debt relative to equity than he typically tolerates, runs thinner pretax margins than he'd like to see, hasn't grown earnings per share fast enough over five years to impress him, and is trading above what a conservative discounted-cash-flow estimate says it's worth right now.

  • ROE (TTM) > 11% ✓
  • ROE (5yr avg) > 11% ✓
  • Debt/Equity < 0.5 ✕
  • Pretax margin > 15% ✕
  • EPS growth (5yr) > 7% ✕
  • Interest coverage > 5x ✓
  • Trading below intrinsic value (DCF) ✕
  • Price vs. owner earnings < 25x ✓
  • Bonus: returning capital via buybacks FY2025
Peter Lynch ✕ Leans no (3/5) · Slow Grower / Cyclical

Lynch looked for growth stories that weren't overpriced for that growth, and KMB falls short of his bar. In its favor: KMB pays a real dividend, the actual reason he bought slow growers at all, is cheap enough for a business with limited growth ahead of it, and converts earnings into real cash at a reasonable price. Where it comes up short: KMB isn't even growing at the modest pace he'd expect from a slow grower, and carries more debt than he liked to see, even allowing for the extra room a large, stable business gets.

  • Dividend yield > 2.5% ✓
  • EPS growth 0%-10% ✕
  • Debt/Equity < 0.6 ✕
  • P/E < 20 ✓
  • Price/FCF < 25 ✓

Quantitative approximations of each investor's documented approach, not endorsed by either investor or their estates - commentary, not this site's actual ranking criteria. Buffett never published a numeric checklist: only 2 of his 8 checks here trace to his own documented concepts ("owner earnings," from his 1986 shareholder letter, and "price is what you pay, value is what you get," his case against fixed P/E/P/B ceilings) - the other 6 (ROE, debt, margins, growth, interest coverage) use commonly-cited thresholds that are not numbers he himself published. The 8 hard filters below (plus the Munger check and Graham margin of safety) are this site's real, mechanical screen and are computed completely independently of the checklists above.

Which of the 8 value filters does Kimberly-Clark pass?

  • Market Cap > $25B $36.7B
  • Trailing P/E < 25 18.78
  • PEG Ratio < 1.5 11.73
  • Price/Book < 8 20.98
  • Price/Sales < 7 2.21
  • EPS Growth YoY > -5% -32.2%
  • vs 50-day MA (±12%) Not evaluated †
  • vs 200-day MA (±12%) Not evaluated †

What is Kimberly-Clark's margin of safety?

-18.1% above intrinsic value

-3% on 2026-10-07 → -18% on 2026-10-23 (5 weekly readings).

Where is Kimberly-Clark in its 52-week range?

52w low $93.05 Now $112.32 52w high $121.44

What is the short interest in Kimberly-Clark?

% of Float 16.1%
Days to Cover 14.2
vs Prior Period +1.3%

53,177,521 shares short as of 2026-09-30 (FINRA settlement date). Reported twice a month, so this only changes roughly every two weeks, not daily.

What could go wrong with Kimberly-Clark? Munger's inversion check

"Invert, always invert." Instead of reasons to buy, these are reasons to hesitate, not a verdict, and not everything worth knowing about a business.

  • Margin of safety, even in the bull case +30%
  • Short interest under 5% of float 16.1%
  • Passes most of the 6 fundamental filters 3/6 passed
  • Price run-up backed by value, not just momentum +19% off 52wk low
  • Debt/equity stable since 2017 11.80 → 4.77

Doesn't cover circle of competence, management quality, or accounting concerns: those need judgment, not data.

How much have Kimberly-Clark shareholders gained per year?

+2.1%· in USD

Earnings growth per share plus dividend.

Earnings per share, growth per year -2.4%
Dividend (yield on the price) 4.6%
Pace: 5yr vs 9yr -2% vs 0%, slowing
Profit margin, 2016 to 2025 12% → 12%

An earnings-based proxy, not a stock-price total return - it doesn't capture multiple expansion/contraction or reinvested dividends. EPS from KMB's own 10-K filings; dividend yield is the current trailing yield on today's price, from the same weekly fetch as the rest of this site.

What do Kimberly-Clark's 10-year financials show?

From KMB's own 10-K filings (SEC EDGAR): up to the last 10 fiscal years. Press any year's bars for the exact figures.

Revenue Net income
$0 $6.7B $13.4B $20.2B 2016 revenue: $18.3B 2016 net income: $2.2B '16 2017 revenue: $18.3B 2017 net income: $2.3B '17 2018 revenue: $18.5B 2018 net income: $1.4B '18 2019 revenue: $18.4B 2019 net income: $2.2B '19 2020 revenue: $19.1B 2020 net income: $2.4B '20 2021 revenue: $19.4B 2021 net income: $1.8B '21 2022 revenue: $20.2B 2022 net income: $1.9B '22 2023 revenue: $17.1B 2023 net income: $1.8B '23 2024 revenue: $16.8B 2024 net income: $2.5B '24 2025 revenue: $16.4B 2025 net income: $2.0B '25
Debt/Equity (2025) 4.77 7yr trend: 11.80 → 4.77
Open in Technical Analysis → Open in Intrinsic Value Calculator → Educational content only, not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions about Kimberly-Clark

What kind of company is Kimberly-Clark?

Kimberly-Clark makes everyday paper-based and hygiene products such as tissues, diapers, wipes, paper towels and feminine and adult-care products, sold in around 175 countries. Brands and businesses it owns include Huggies, Kleenex, Cottonelle, Scott, Viva and Kotex. This site groups it with Consumer products stocks.

Is Kimberly-Clark trading above or below its DCF value?

At $112.32, KMB trades 18.1% above this site's neutral DCF value of $95.08 per share, a margin of safety of −18.1%. That DCF projects free cash flow for 10 years, with growth starting at 8% and fading to 2.5%, discounted at 10%; it is one set of assumptions, not a forecast. Test your own in the Intrinsic Value Calculator.

How many of this site's 8 value filters does Kimberly-Clark pass?

KMB passes 3 of 8. It passes Market Cap > $25B ($36.7B), Trailing P/E < 25 (18.78) and Price/Sales < 7 (2.21). It misses PEG Ratio < 1.5 (11.73), Price/Book < 8 (20.98) and EPS Growth YoY > -5% (-32.2%). vs 50-day MA (±12%) and vs 200-day MA (±12%) were not evaluated, because the moving-average checks only run on stocks that clear the fundamentals first. The 8-filter list shows every stock that passes all of them.

How much cash does Kimberly-Clark return to shareholders?

KMB's net shareholder yield is +4.5%: the cash it returns through dividends and buybacks, minus stock-based compensation, as a share of its market value. Latest fiscal year (2025): dividends 4.5% + buybacks 0.4% − stock comp 0.4%, as a share of today's market cap. Over 14 years its split-adjusted share count fell 16%. Its trailing dividend yield is 4.57%, paid out of 91% of its free cash flow; the dividend-sustainability check raises 2 of 6 flags (high leverage and declining revenue). See Shareholder Yield Leaders and the Sustainable Dividend Screener.

When does Kimberly-Clark report earnings next?

Kimberly-Clark's next earnings report is expected on November 5, 2026 before the market opens, with analysts expecting earnings of $1.64 per share. Dates come from the Finnhub earnings calendar and can move. In its last 4 quarters it beat the estimate 4 times, by an average of +2.9%.

How heavily is Kimberly-Clark stock sold short?

As of September 30, 2026, 16.1% of KMB's float was sold short (53,177,521 shares, 14.2 days to cover), up 1.3% from the prior reporting period. FINRA publishes short interest twice a month, so it changes about every two weeks; this site flags anything above 5% of the float.

Where do these numbers come from?

About this Kimberly-Clark Corp analysis

This page shows every value-investing check the site runs on Kimberly-Clark Corp (KMB) in one place: the 8 mechanical filters, the Buffett and Lynch checklists, a margin of safety from a disclosed DCF, earnings quality, shareholder yield and how it ranks against its sector peers. The numbers come from SEC filings and public market data, refreshed weekly, and the same rules apply to every stock on the stock list. See Editorial Standards for the sources and the rules, or run your own filters in the stock screener.